Government’s Catalytic Role in Emerging Economy: Critical Comparison of China’s Conspicuous Strength in Wind and Solar Industry



Narasimalu Srikanth and Chihiro Watanabe


In light of a conspicuous strength in China’s solar and wind industry in recent years this paper analyses the catalytic role of the government in inducing the institutional source of its strength. Critical comparison of the two industries show China’s renewable energy policies for wind industry was more effective than the solar industry through adopting a self-propagating functionality development through fusing the external technology with domestic industries know-how to co-evolve both production and diffusion through effective assimilation. This suggests a new insight for growing economy to devise effective policy framework to develop a globally competitive industry


Fusion, learning, global best practices, growing economy, global competitiveness.


  • Chandler, J., (2009) ‘Trendy Solutions: Why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards’, Energy Policy 37:8, pp. 3274-81.
  • Feinberg, S. and Majumdar,S. (2001) ‘Technology Spillovers from FDI in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry’ Journal of International Business Studies, 32:3, pp. 421-438.
  • Frost, T.S. (2001) ‘The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations’, Strategic Management Journal, 22:2, pp. 101–123.
  • Jacobsson, S., and Johnson, A. (2000) ‘The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research’, Energy Policy, 28:9, pp. 625-640.
  • Lin, J. (2007) ‘Energy conservation investments: A comparison between China and the US’, Energy Policy, 35:2, pp. 916–924.
  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. (2003), The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process, Knowledge Management Research & Practice (2003) 1, 2–10.
  • OECD (2009) Xiaolan Fu (Ed.), Foreign direct investment, absorptive capacity and regional innovation capabilities: evidence from China,
  • Speed, A. P. (2009) ‘China’s ongoing energy efficiency drive: Origins, progress and prospects’, Energy Policy, 37:4, pp. 1331–1344.
  • Tilman A., Hubert S., and Andreas S. (2008) ‘Breakthrough? China’s and India’s Transition from Production to Innovation’, World Development, 36:2, pp. 325–344.
  • Watanabe, C., Asgari, B. and Nagamatsu, A. (2003) ‘Virtuous cycle between R&D, functionality development and assimilation capacity for competitive strategy in Japan’s high-technology industry’, Technovation, 23:11, pp. 879–900.
  • Yao, R., Lib B. and Steemersa, K. (2005) ‘Energy policy and standard for built environment in China’, Renewable Energy, 30:13, pp.1973–1988.
  • Zhao, W. and Watanabe, C. (2008) ‘A comparison of institutional systems affecting software advancement in China and India: The role of outsourcing from Japan and the United States’, Technology in Society, 30:3, pp. 429–436.
  • Zhang, D., Chai , Q., Zhang ,X., He , X., Yue, L., Dong , X. and Wu, S.(2012) ‘Economical assessment of large-scale photovoltaic power development in China’, Energy 40:1, pp. 370-375.

RNI Registration No. CHAENG/2016/68678