Technology Leapfrogging: Findings from Singapore\\\'s Water Industry

DOI
10.15415/jtmge.2010.12011

AUTHORS

Michele Y.C. Chew, Chihiro Watanabe and Yuji Tou

ABSTRACT

This paper illustrates Singapore’s strategy in catching up with global water treatment nations. Water is an important economic resource for Singapore, creating value-added jobs and stimulating research and development in various related technology trajectories. The analysis shows that from a nation lacking in competence in the water industry, Singapore has successfully transformed herself into a global hydrohub, exporting indigenous capabilities and offering consultancy for water projects. With long-term government policies and funding support for initial R&D and subsequent industry R&D inducement by means of the introduction of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) programme, Singapore has been able to build up her competence in waste water treatment. This is probably the first paper that analyses the development of the water industry in Singapore from the management of technology and policy perspectives.

KEYWORDS

Water Industry, Public Private Partnership, Global Hydrohub, Goverment stimulation, Singapore strategy, Water Treatment

REFERENCES

  • Gregory, F.N. (2006) ‘Beyond the Learning Curve: Factors Influencing Cost Reductions in Photovoltaics’, Energy Policy, 34, 3218-3232.
  • Nelson, R.R. and Sampat, B.N. (2001) ‘Making Sense of Institution as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44, 31-54.
  • North, D.C. (1990) Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • OCED Report (2010) Innovative Financing Mechanisms for the Water Sector, OECD, 2010.
  • Watanabe, C. (1992) ‘Trends in Substitution of Production Factors to Technology: Empirical Analysis of the Inducing Impact of the Energy Crisis on Japanese Industrial Technology’, Research Policy, 21:6, 481-505.
  • Watanabe, C. (1999) ‘Systems Option for Sustainable Development: Effect and Limit of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry’s Efforts to Substitute Technology for Energy’, Research Policy, 28:7, 719-749.
  • Watanabe, C. and Asgari, B. (2004) ‘Impacts of Functionality Development on the Dynamism between Learning and Diffusion of Technology’, Technovation, 24:8, 651-664.
  • Watanabe, C. Moriyama, K. and Shin, J. (2009) ‘Functionality Development Dynamism in a Diffusion Trajectory: A Case of Japan’s Mobile Phone Development’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76:6, 737-753.

RNI Registration No. CHAENG/2016/68678