Catalyst Role of Government R&D Inducing Hybrid Management in Japan: Lessons for Emerging Economies

DOI
10.15415/jtmge.2010.12015

AUTHORS

Kayano Fukuda and Chihiro Watanabe

ABSTRACT

Japan has achieved conspicuous technology advancement and subsequent productivity increase by overcoming threats and constraints of sustainable development of economy and society. The achievement can be attributed to a sophisticated combination of industrial efforts and government stimulation. This paper analyzes the government role in inducing industrial strength in Japan. Empirical analyses were conducted focusing on technology driven development trajectory between Japan and the US over the last two decades. The results reveal that Japan incorporates sophisticated mechanism enabling the hybrid management of technology fusing indigenous strength and learning ability. While the combination of government and industry stagnated in the 1990s, a swell of reactivation emerged in the early 2000s. This can largely be attributed to revitalization of the mutual interaction between government and industry. Such a catalyst role of government R&D inducing the hybrid management demonstrated by Japan would provide a new insight in emerging economies.

KEYWORDS

Goverment R&D, Inducing policy, Catalyst role, Hybrid Management, Innovation System.

REFERENCES

  • Archibugi, D. and Pietrobelli, C. (2003) ‘The Globalisation of Technology and Its Implications for Developing Countries Windows of Opportunity or Further Burden?’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70:9, 861-883.
  • Arrow, K. (1962) ‘The Economic Implications of Learning By Doing’, Review of Economic Studies, 29:3, 155-173.
  • Breznitz, D. (2007) ‘Industrial R&D as a National Policy: Horizontal Technology Policies and Industry-state Co-evolution in the Growth of the Israeli Software Industry’, Research Policy, 36, 1465-1482.
  • Dosi, G., Llerena, P. and Labini, M. S. (2006) ‘The Relationships between Science, Technologies and Their Industrial Exploitation: An Illustration through the Myths and Realities of the Socalled ‘European Paradox’’, Research Policy, 35:10, 1450–1464.
  • Fukuda, K. and Watanabe, C. (2008) ‘Japanese and US perspectives on the National Innovation Ecosystem’, Technology in Society, 30:1, 49-63.
  • Vogel, S.K. (2006) Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry are Reforming Japanese Capitalism, New York, Cornell University Press.
  • Wakabayashi, K., Griffy-Brown, C. and Watanabe, C. (1999) ‘Stimulating R&D: An Analysis of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry’s ‘Visions’ and the Current Challenges Facing Japan’s Technology Policy-making Mechanisms’, Science and Public Policy, 26, 2- 16.
  • Watanabe, C. (1992) ‘Trends in the Substitution of Production Factors to Technology’, Research Policy, 21:6, 481-505.
  • Watanabe, C. (1995) ‘The Feedback Loop Between Technology and Economic Development: an Examination of Japanese Industry’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 49:2, 127-145.
  • Watanabe, C. (1999) ‘Systems Option for Sustainable Development: Effect and Limit of MITI’s Efforts to Substitute Technology for Energy’, Research Policy, 28:7, 719-749.
  • Watanabe, C., Zhu, B., Griffy-Brown, C. and Asgari, B. (2001) ‘Global Technology Spillover and Its Impact on Industry’s R&D Strategies’, Technovation, 21:5, 281-291.
  • Watanabe, C. (2002) ‘Industrial Ecology and Technology Policy: Japanese Experience’ In Ayres R.U. and Ayres L.M. (eds.) A Handbook of Industrial Ecology, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, pp. 232-245.

RNI Registration No. CHAENG/2016/68678