Understanding Interactions between Researches Institutes and Industry: Indian Perspective



S. Rama Mohan


The tangible potential benefits of interactions between public research institutes and industry are often not realized in practice due to many complexities underlying these interactions. As the interaction is between two diverse organizations, it needs considerable management effort at all stages to make it successful and to get the maximum benefit. Therefore, there is every need to study these interactions, and critically examining different dimensions and identifying key factors that matter in institute-industry interface. This will provide an insight into effective management of their interactions. The present study attempts to assess the situation existing in Indian context. It tries to understand the interactions from the perspective of actual researchers and managers of these interactions at research institutes. The study resulted in identifying key factors at different stages of interaction which if managed correctly, increase the probability of effective and successful interactions leading to development of good technologies. The study also tries to explore whether there is any difference in the perception of researchers across the experience levels and disciplines, and also between researchers and managers.



  • Blumenthal,D., Gluck,M., Seashore Louis,K., Stoto,M.A., Wise, D., 1986. University–industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university. Science, 272, 1361.
  • Drejer, I., Jorgensen, B.H., 2005. The dynamic creation of knowledge:Analysing public–private collaborations. Technovation, 25(2), 83.
  • Forrest, J.E., Martin, M.J.C., 1992. Strategic alliances between large and small research intensive organisations experience in biotechnology industry. R&D Mgt, 22(1), 34.
  • Greiner, M.A., Franza, R.M., 2003. Barriers and bridges for successful environmental technology transfer. J.Technol. Transfer, 28(2), 167.
  • Hameri, A.P., 1996. Technology transfer between basic research and industry. Technovation, 16(2), 51.
  • Heslop, L.A., McGregor, E.M., Griffith, M., 2001. Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment measure: The Cloveleaf Model of technology transfer. J. Technol. Transfer, 26(4), 369.
  • Hsu, C.W., 2005. Formation of industrial innovation mechanisms through research institute. Technovation, 25(11), 1317.
  • Liu,H., Jiang, Y., 2001. Technology transfer from higher education institutions to industry in china: nature and implications. Technovation, 21(3), 175.
  • Marquesa, J.P.C., Carac, J.M.G., Dizc, H., 2006. How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—the case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation,26, 534.
  • Rama Mohan, S., Ramakrishna Rao, A., 2005. Strategy for technology development in public R&D institutes by partnering with industry. Technovation, 25(12), 1484.
  • Rasmussen, E., 2008. Government instruments to support the commercialization of university research: Lessons from Canada. Technovation, 28(8), 506.
  • Rogers, E.M., Carayannis, E.G., Kurihara, K., Allbritton, M.M., 1998. CRADAs as technology transfer mechanisms. R&D Mgt, 28(2), 79.
  • Upadhyay, V.K., Sikka, P., Abrol, D.K., Technology dissemination programmes and extramural R&D support in India. J.Technol. Transfer(in press)
  • Upstill, G., Symington, D., 2002. Technology transfer and the creation of companies: CSIRO experience. R&D Mgt,32(3), 233.

RNI Registration No. CHAENG/2016/68678